Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aurelia aurita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2012 at 12:26:46 (UTC)

OriginalMoon jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) in the Pairi Daiza aquarium in Belgium.
Reason
High EV, high quality, impressive
Articles in which this image appears
Aurelia aurita
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria
Creator
Lviatour
  • Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's pretty, but it seems like there's either some motion blur or way too narrow depth of field: most of the image seems out of focus. Also, the image description page mentions that it is "false colour", which I think detracts from the EV. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 17:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurry. That's unfortunate because I like this otherwise. False color doesn't bother me if it's used with good reason. Pine 06:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support Procedural oppose. I think this is as good as we can expect given the typical ambient aquarium lighting. Wild specimens will have other problems, e.g. the difficulty of assigning a definite species id. --Avenue (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Changing to oppose based on the process, per Dante Alighieri. I'd probably feel differently if there was evidence of a good faith attempt to incorporate both pictures in the article, not driven solely by the desire to make this picture eligible for FPC. --Avenue (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural Oppose. You're the one who added it to the article, and you replaced an existing Featured Picture to do so, with no edit comment. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oops, sorry, I didn't notice there was an existing FP as a lead image. Really sorry. I withdraw for now. Avenue, I'm quite hurt by your things - "I'd feel differently if there was... a good faith", "not driven solely by the desire to make this picture eligible". Is that really how you think I work? What about some good faith? Tomer T (talk) 08:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm sorry. I'm sure you didn't notice the image you replaced was an existing FP. I saw your actions as representative of a pattern that I feel happens too often here, of thoughtless replacement of images so that a new image can go through FPC. I tend to assume much less good faith when there's no edit summary, but should have thought better of you. --Avenue (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]