Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/FoxBassoon.jpg

Support Alvesgaspar 11:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have long loved this photo. A great illustration of a bassoon, highly encyclopedic. Mak (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support High enc, high quality. Errors are slight: DOF of left bassoon (actually, I think it's just two shots of a single one... ;-), slight "cut" into left top of right one (should be fixed), unavoidable blown metal highlights. --Janke | Talk 17:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support highly enc, and great overall. Minor tech probs can be overlooked imo. ~ Arjun 18:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very high quality shot of one of my favourite woodwinds (oboe and recorder being my absolute faves). --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Per above. --Tewy 20:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Wonderful quality shot; nicely done. TotoBaggins 21:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. High quality, overall I like it; however the bassoon to right has its mouthpiece not parallel to the one on the left. William Pembroke 20:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it's not two bassoons, it's two different angles of the same bassoon. Also, bocals swivel, also oppose, turban color not typical. Mak (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]