Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hubble Ultra Deep Field 2014 2
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2014 at 01:23:14 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality, absolutely astounding in regards to the amount of detail. Complements the FP File:Hubble ultra deep field high rez edit1.jpg very well.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Hubble Ultra-Deep Field +4
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
- Creator
- NASA, ESA, H. Teplitz and M. Rafelski (IPAC/Caltech), A. Koekemoer (STScI), R. Windhorst (Arizona State University), and Z. Levay (STScI)
- Support as nominator – — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment From what I can tell, File:Hubble ultra deep field high rez edit1.jpg covers a lot more area. Why doesn't this one? Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- NASA's press release doesn't say. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm mainly just worried there might be a bigger, fuller one we could grab. Chances of this? Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Neither source here has one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support, I suppose. D&R can always be done later, right? Though I don't like it so much as the old one - I think one of the new signals has lower resolution and is removing a bit of the sharpness. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Neither source here has one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm mainly just worried there might be a bigger, fuller one we could grab. Chances of this? Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- NASA's press release doesn't say. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- File:Hubble ultra deep field high rez edit1.jpg was delisted, right? On the other hand apparently it was featured as pic of the day 24 September 2014. Deep. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- No, it hasn't been delisted, nor has it run yet (it is scheduled to run in 2 months). This is a new release from NASA which complements the original, and would make for a more interesting blurb if we put them side by side. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely breathtaking. Capturing the full range of spectrum and the detail give this lasting value. Fylbecatulous talk 13:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support Nice! ///EuroCarGT 05:26, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Evokes awe and a sense of wonder. An all-time classic. Jusdafax 05:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Very nice. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Promoted File:NASA-HS201427a-HubbleUltraDeepField2014-20140603.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 01:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)