Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Khalsa Heritage Memorial Complex, India
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 15:02:20 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good quality high resolution image of a newly constructed museum in India. The photopraph has been taken on a clear day with blue sky and clear reflection in water. Human presence adds to the scale of the structure and the image follows the rules of architectural photography.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Virasat-e-Khalsa, Moshe Safdie, Anandpur Sahib
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Sanyam Bahga
- Support as nominator --Sanyambahga (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Fails to meet lowest required resolution on the height... Is this a cropped picture? If so, could you upload the original version? Dusty777 18:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's only required for one dimension to exceed 1000px. So while it's unusually small considering its genre, the image is strictly speaking okay for the resolution criterion. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- If this was shot on a Nikon D60 like the EXIF data suggests, there ought to be a 10 megapixel original somewhere.... TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Reply -- I have uploaded the maximum resolution version of the image. Please re-review the image. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- If this was shot on a Nikon D60 like the EXIF data suggests, there ought to be a 10 megapixel original somewhere.... TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's only required for one dimension to exceed 1000px. So while it's unusually small considering its genre, the image is strictly speaking okay for the resolution criterion. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Oppose-- The resolution, as compared to the camera's abilities, indicates improper downsampling. I'd reconsider the original image or one with less drastic downsampling. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)- Reply -- I have uploaded the maximum resolution version of the image. Please re-review the image. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support full sized version only. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support ALT1 as well. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support full sized version only. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Reply -- I have uploaded the maximum resolution version of the image. Please re-review the image. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Inclined to support as good composition, but the strong CA is bit disturbing. --ELEKHHT 12:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Weak support Alt1 Still some CA left (left columns) and overall a bit soft, but it helps balancing our systemic bias for US/UK. --ELEKHHT 22:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. Added ALT-1. I tried to reduce the CAs in Photoshop. O.J. (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Seems like a picture with high EV. I don't see any major technical flaws. Dusty777 17:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support ALT-1 per Dusty Jkadavoor (talk) 06:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support ALT-1. I like the composition and quality is sufficient. Not all architecture shots have to be photo stiches. O.J. (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Khalsa Heritage Memorial 176 Edit.jpg --Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- With no prejudice as to addressing further concerns through D&R. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)