Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mary Jackson portrait
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2022 at 23:59:02 (UTC)
.jpg)
- Reason
- Does have certain issues with blown highlights, but given the age, I think we can forgive that.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Mary Jackson (engineer) +1
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science_and_engineering
- Creator
- NASA, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 23:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support – we do have a FP of her, but I wouldn't mind a portrait photo. Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Reodorant (talk) 19:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry, but I have to oppose this one on EV grounds. Given that we have an excellent FP of her already with a much more natural composition in an engineering environment relevant to her profession, I fail to see what a bland portrait of her adds to the comprehensive value of her article. -- Veggies (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's been stable as lead for a while. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 02:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to it on stability grounds. Typically, infoboxes use portraits, rather than dynamic-composition photos, to illustrate the person in a bio article. I just don't feel it adds as much or more to the encyclopedic quality of the article than the FP photo we have of her already. It's a bland photo of a historical figure with much better alternative photos in the public domain. -- Veggies (talk) 22:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Eh, well, it's the third one I've done of her. Variety is good in illustration, and people disliked the wind tunnel one for some reason. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 03:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to it on stability grounds. Typically, infoboxes use portraits, rather than dynamic-composition photos, to illustrate the person in a bio article. I just don't feel it adds as much or more to the encyclopedic quality of the article than the FP photo we have of her already. It's a bland photo of a historical figure with much better alternative photos in the public domain. -- Veggies (talk) 22:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's been stable as lead for a while. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 02:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, very strained expression, and we have an FP already.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Promoted File:Mary Jackson 1979 Portrait (LRC-1979-B701 P-07085).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 01:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)