Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Owl

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 14:16:03 (UTC)

Support as nominator --PERSIA ♠ 14:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose -- Low EV as currently used and seems to be overly saturated. Angle of the horizon seems odd too. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Species is Athene cunicularia Burrowing owl, but not used in that article. 75.41.110.200 (talk) 23:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over saturation and article placement leaves a bit to be desired. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think we can get a better picture of an owl for that article. Pine^talk 07:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, it's a great photo, I love the composition and the colours of the background. But the colour balance on the owl and post is too yellow for me. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 07:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --J Milburn (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]