Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plan 10

Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2012 at 08:35:14 (UTC)

Reason: In a previous nomination, there was an edit introduced that didn't have much time to reach a consensus. As the edit has replaced to formerly nominated image, I think we should have another look at this.
Articles in which this image appears: Plan 9 from Outer Space, Z movie, B movie, List of films considered the worst
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Tom Jung, restored by Ottojula

Support as nominator --Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The poster isn't particularly arty and eye-catching, as compared to that for Mutiny on Bounty for example. Brandmeister t 02:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our personal taste in the art style in something such as a movie poster or artwork should generally not be considered, but the quality of the reproduction. The reason being that the EV is derived from its representation of the subject of an article (in this case, Plan 9... below, an etching by Rembrandt). Posters such as that at Deep Throat have some of the highest EV possible for the film. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support The EV is high, the colors are great, and the size it good. It is a Z movie poster. If it looked artsy it would be expensive. --Guerillero | My Talk 05:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again, images should be judged on how well they illustrate the subject, not how much you like them. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. O.J. (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This film was fantastically awful. Good illustration. Jujutacular ^talk 16:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, just as I promised. Fallingmasonry (talk) 07:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nik thestoned 13:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice reproduction and high EV (never heard of the film but this picture sums up without the need for even reading the earticle just jow terrible it must have been).God Emperor^Talk 17:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as above. Tells us a lot about the film. J Milburn (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Plan 9 Alternative poster.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]