Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wildpferde Tripsdrill

Wildpferde Tripsdrill

Reason: really nice picture!
Articles in which this image appears: Geography of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture, ~~Portal:Horses/Selected picture/15~~, Wild horse, Tarpan, Cleebronn, Erlebnispark Tripsdrill
Creator: Brackenheim

* Support as nominator --109.192.36.50 (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Conditional oppose, leaning toward support. Only use in article space is in a gallery. Could you find a better place for it? Portals don't count. Durova⁴¹² 19:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info Coat colour in this case seems to be silver grullo [1], whatever that may mean for the status of these two individuals in re-breeding programs of wild horses. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 00:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image has been removed from all of the horse articles. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the fact that these horses are kept as an attraction in an amusement park is encyclopaedic in its own right, but of course, their status as reconstituted wild horses should be made explicit. In any case, the stub Erlebnispark Tripsdrill needed creating. Anyone with the superhero power of translation should feel welcome to chip in. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Is there any particular reason portals are not valid? The portal space is a reader-facing space, and does put a lot of show on certain images. J Milburn (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that although portals are reader-facing, having an image, for example, that is good but only in a portal wouldn't have enc. value. I think the enc. is gained simply from articles, so the portal links are not "invalid" per se, but rather, the nomination should focus on the use of the pictures in the articles. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 03:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]