Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Eiffel Tower (2009 FP)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 23:49:10 (UTC)

Reason: The cropped version is the one actually used in the main article, and has been stable there since 2016.
Articles this image appears in: Current FP is still in Landmark, Landmarks in Paris, Lattice tower, List of cultural icons of France, List of nonbuilding structure types, Structural art and Structural engineering; suggested replacement is in Eiffel Tower, Arch and List of most visited palaces and monuments
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eiffel Tower
Nominator: Paul_012 (talk)

~~Delist & replace~~ — Paul_012 (talk) 23:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rather over-cropped if you ask me. Maye try a compromise? Leave the top as in uncropped, crop the bottom somewhere between? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 09:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Something like Alt1 below? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt1 – half as cropped (CSS image crop)

I agree regarding the over-crop. I prefer the original. It was probably cropped just for infobox use. Bammesk (talk) 03:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that the current FP is aesthetically better, but the aspect ratio really doesn't work well for infobox use (even the cropped version still overwhelms the vertical space). Are we okay with not having the FP be used in the main article, where it has the most EV? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Trivially restored to the page using {{CSS image crop}}. Which I did. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 12:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, never thought of that as an option. Withdrawing nomination. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Adam. MER-C 17:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]