Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3/1
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Much of the article is uncited, including the entire "Wartime service" section. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- There was just a GA reassessment in 2022. @Redrose64 and Whiteguru: Do you have any thoughts or input on this? SnowFire (talk) 04:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- If this is a GA reassessment, and Talk:LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3/GA1 is also a GA reassessment, why are their names so different? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Whiteguru used the individual reassessment process, which is now deprecated. Beats me if that was the right location for an individual reassessment. But I don't think GAR page location is the most relevant concern here anyway - do you have any comment on the quality of the article? SnowFire (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If this is a GA reassessment, and Talk:LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3/GA1 is also a GA reassessment, why are their names so different? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delist; sourcing issues and shouldn't've been kept in 2022. Queen of Hearts (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.