Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Peter Penfold/2
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Keep. CMD (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
This article fails multiple GA criteria. Firstly, there are many uncited claims and sentences in the article, and some paragraphs only have 2 or 3 citations. Secondly, there is literally no media on the page, not even a picture of the main subject, and while not technically failing criteria #6, there should be media on this page. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the entire article is cited, except the lead which does not need to be per MOS:CITELEAD. Perhaps there is no media extant, otherwise you could add it. (t · c) buidhe 18:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: There may simply be no public domain images we can find of this living individual. That lack of media does not seem a reason to delist. SecretName101 (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
