Help desk
< December 23	<< Nov \| December \| Jan >>	December 25 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

December 24

Everybody Dance! (TV Series)

Hi there, I have a question about some reverts I made. Several mass blanks and destructive edits were made by a user, and you will see in the edit history I tried to revert them. However I think some damage remains as I was undoing, but do not have the roll back feature. Can someone more experienced than I please review my revert and if it's incorrect, use your tools to undo my reverts and restore the page to a clean edit? Also, is there a way to view a revision ID? I can usually only see them if I undo a revision. Thanks. Such-change47 (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Such-change47: I undid all of Allir's edits to Everybody Dance! (TV series). You can view a revision ID by going to the article, clicking the "View history" tab, and clicking any date link. Hope this helps, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 04:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoingBatty: thanks, I had undone two but then the others i couldnt. Thanks! Such-change47 (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anecdotes

I am curious about how tolerant Wikipedia is of anecdotes

Please take a look at:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620

This seems unusual. The section has been validated by quite a few people as true, but is totally uncited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AVandewerdt (talk • contribs) 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AVandewerdt: What do you mean uncited? There is a citation at the end of the sentence. RudolfRed (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Edit Conflict] AVandewerdt, which section do you have in mind? Your link only goes to the article (in Mobile view – personally I find the Desktop view much easier to read) as a whole, and there are several passages which are sparse or bare of references, but this may reflect under-citations to the existing (currently 46) references rather than a reliance on "anecdote".

The Anecdotes section itself is short and has one direct citation and a relevant link to another part of the article: only one statement in the section is entirely unreferenced. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.193.131.122 (talk) 01:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AVandewerdt: Hi there! I added {{citation needed}} to the last sentence in IBM 1620#Anecdotes. Happy editing! (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) GoingBatty (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I failed to note that there was one cite. My main question was around titling a section 'anecdotes' and whether that is common. It doesn't seem to quite fit with other articles.AVandewerdt (talk) 05:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AVandewerdt: There are only 189 articles with a section header starting with "Anecdotes", so it is not common. GoingBatty (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weird visual editor bug causing people to insert messed-up citation needed templates

Check out this diff. I have been seeing (and cleaning up) a lot of these -- is there some bug with Visual Editor that's causing it to do this? The nowiki tags are being placed in seemingly random locations as well. jp×g 06:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Found another, also using Visual Editor. jp×g 06:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And another. jp×g 06:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Weird stuff! You might want to go to Wikipedia:VisualEditor and click on "Report a problem with VisualEditor". Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]