I've listed this article for peer review because I'm considering an FAC for it. I had a good bit of a lashing the last time I brought up a different article for FAC before, so I have been a bit spooked about the process since then... but would love to take another go at it now that some time has passed with an article that I think is stronger overall than my previous attempt was. Would love to specifically address comments that FAC reviewers might make in advance here.
Hi User:Nomader, 2018 was an era when there was a bad shortage of reviewers at FAC; the problem is less acute now so you're less likely to get archived for inactivity. Although I can't really check the sourcing, the article overall looks well-written and well structured. I would just go for it! Worst that can happen is it doesn't get promoted. (t · c) buidhe08:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!
