Wikipedia:Peer review/21st Century Breakdown/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to promote it to FA status, but since I don't have much article editing experience I do not know what exactly needs to be done to it for it to be promoted. 21st Century Breakdown is a well-known (perhaps worldwide) album by Green Day so it's notable enough to qualify for FA status.
Thanks, Addihockey11 (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Note to nominator: You are not an active editor on this article. You say you'd "like to promote it FA status"; but you have not, as far as I can see, discussed this possibility with the article's main editor, User:IllaZilla, who has more than 300 edits to the article, the most recent on 9 November. You are brand new to Wikipedia (9 edits in total); I think that you could use a bit more experience of editing before trying to steer an article through FA. If you would like to work on this article and help bring it to FA quality, I suggest that you post a message on the article's talkpage, offering your services as a helper to this end, and see what transpires. Brianboulton (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: I agree with Brianboulton's comments above. As far as the article goes, I don't see much to complain about, although I don't know enough to say whether it's comprehensive or not. Here are a very few suggestions for improvement.
- Citation 2 is incomplete.
- The link checker at the top of this review page finds four dead urls in the citations.
- Citations 71, 75, 80, 82, 89, and apparently 101 and 104 are incomplete.
- The date formatting in citations 101 and 102 are nonconforming; that is, they do not use the same formatting as the other citations.
- I fixed a very few minor prose and style problems.
- The image licenses look fine to me.
I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog at WP:PR; that is where I found this one. I don't usually watch the PR archives or check corrections or changes. If my comments are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)