Wikipedia:Peer review/Adobe Systems/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.
Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Four short paras in the lead need work - check out WP:LEAD.
- Images should be sized per WP:MOS#Images and captions, if fragments, shouldn't have periods.
- "In a classic failure to predict..." - POV.
- "but a poorly produced version for Windows." - POV.
- Company events section should be prose, not list.
- And headings should meet WP:HEAD.
- And four citations for the "events" is wholly inadequate.
- Corporate leadership needs work, seems mostly trivial.
- Products should be prose and adequately summarise all apps made by Adobe, not just a tiny list.
- Financial info section is dull. It needs to be made into prose (in my opinion) and needs discussion rather than just bare tables of raw figures.
- 20 citations in total? And many from Adobe themselves? Not good enough.
That'll do, right now this'll struggle for GA. Good luck! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)