Wikipedia:Peer review/America's Next Top Model/archive1

America's Next Top Model

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it meets with the FA criteria, and has good references.

Thanks, Glitter1959 (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Glitter1959[reply]

Not ready Sorry Glitter this article is not ready for FA (or even GA). At a minimum for FA it requires a much more professional tone of writing, and images before it can even be considered. Also in my opinion the article needs to become more stable which it is not currently. If you go to this page you will see the difference between FA and GA which might give you some further ideas. Best wishes.--VS ^talk 22:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All of the references in the article need to be formatted properly, WP:CITE should give you some advice on how to do that. -Malkinann (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 04:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thouhgts by user:Chrisisinchrist

Overall, I think this is an OK artile, but it still needs lots of work to become a good article and featured article. I will point out a few things:

References: A lot of unverified information. The tone of this article is a little premature. Much of the information on this page may be true, however, in the context that it is presented, it looks like original research, especially in the Show format section. This article lacks sufficient references for the amount of information it has. Information should be verified by a source.
Missing sections: I know this is a reality competition series, but someone new to the show might not get a full scope of the series from the article. You need to add a section on the shows conception, its critical acclaim and awards, reception, ratings...more iformation on its transition from UPN to the CW. This article doesnt present a full scope of the series from the perspective of someone who may have never watched a single episode.
Expand on covergirls connection to show, the judges and why janice dickinson, kimora lee simmons and twiggy are no longer apart of the series, tyra banks response to the writers labor dispute, tyra's connection to the international versions of the show, etc.
Some of the information in the show format section would be better if removed and placed in the individual article pages. The show format section needs to be presented in a more professional writting style.--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]