Wikipedia:Peer review/Archy and Mehitabel/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of a few things: 1)it's a little too early, but the centennial anniversary of this column will be in four years, but since no one really knows who this cockrocah poet and this feline who claims to be Cleopatra are anymore, i would like to make it on the featured article so everyone knows who these animals are 2)i'm sorta new here, and i have no idea wotthehell (wink, wink to the fans) am i doing, so feel free to tell me if i'm doing it wrong so i can clean it up. i would actually like to take a big leap because i've done NOTHING for this past year since signing up for Wikipedia. and so, i would like it to be on the main page in four years. is the article in horrible condition? Yes! am i inexperienced? Yes! will you help me? probably not, but you'll expand on it, i hope.
Thanks, Youknowmyname657 (talk) 22:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)