Wikipedia:Peer review/Australia at the Winter Olympics/archive3
Appearance
Had a recent peer review, and a FAC done a day or two ago that I withdrew in response to stability concerns. Andjam 08:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Pics are far too small. They are barely noticable. That would be the first thing to fix. Also, the same one appears twice. Tobyk777 05:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- One is a stamp of Steven Bradbury, the other is a stamp of Alisa Camplin. What size do you think they should be? Thanks, Andjam 10:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- External links should be at the end. Also, I don't like footnote overload, but the article is rather light on inline citations (try to have at least oen per paragraph; I think that's a good rule of thumb). The last section with any major content (the paralympics one) has no footnotes at all. Anyone reading the article would wonder how reliable it is... Johnleemk | Talk 16:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't done inline for the Paralympics, but I've added a reference. I've also added a few missing inlines. How does it look now? Thanks, Andjam 12:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Looking better, but there's still some way to go. Good work so far, however. If you can get at least one footnote per paragraph (just a rule of thumb, no need to take it too literally), it should be good enough to go on FAC. Johnleemk | Talk 14:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't done inline for the Paralympics, but I've added a reference. I've also added a few missing inlines. How does it look now? Thanks, Andjam 12:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)