Wikipedia:Peer review/Australian Christian Lobby/archive1

Australian Christian Lobby

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…

There are only two major contributors for the article, myself - I am deeply opposed to the ACL and tend to collect reliable criticism of the organisation and add it to the article (I try very hard not break any guidelines in the process), and another editor strongly if favour of the ACL who collects favourable reviews of the ACL to add to the article. In the interest of being impartial I think we should get some more opinions. It also deeply bothers me that whilst the majority of references criticising the ACL come from independent parties (Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Herald Sun, etc...) the majority of references in favour of the ACL come directly from the ACL. It does not surprise me that the ACL can't seem to find much support outside their own websites, considering they actively and aggressively campaign against what the majority of people want, but I fear an edit war if I choose to remove their references myself.

Thanks, Freikorp (talk) 23:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brief comment: Peer review is not the forum for the resolution of editorial disputes, and the presence of a major cleanup banner means the article is not eligible for the PR process. However, I do see that you are looking to resolve a problem here, so I will take an informal look and leave some comments on the article's talkpage. It may be a few days before I can do this, however. Meanwhile, may I request that you close this review? Brianboulton (talk) 23:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks for taking a look. No problem - how do I close the review? Freikorp (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I've closed the review, I wonder what the appropriate venue is. There's probably no point asking for RFC because sam56mas hasn't put his side of the case, and looks like he won't. I'll put a note on an editor or two's page to see if they have any suggestions. --Deadly∀ssassin 10:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]