Wikipedia:Peer review/Billy DeBeck/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
The article contains a thorough overview of the subject's life and work, it is fully referenced, fairly well illustrated and, as far as I can tell, it isn't missing any important details. I'm aiming at getting this article to GA status.
Thanks, CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 07:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Comments
- Not sure you need to link "American".
- Lots of text squashed between images looks very unprofessional.
- Moved them around. Done CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- "popular in the 1920s and 1930s, featured a number of popular characters" overuse of "popular".
- Reworded. Done CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- " in a "big-foot" style." I don't know what that means at all. Should you link Bigfoot?
- I've reworded it in a way that I hope is more clear. Done CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- "on the South Side of Chicago" any reason for the capitalisation of South Side?
- Decapitalized. Done
- " had copied from Dana" was Dana referred to as Dana? Seems odd, but if so, then no problem.
- He was referred to as "Dana" in the source, but I'm not sure how widespread that is. I've changed it. Done CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- "In May 1915, he and a partner named Carter" perhaps tighten up, "he and partner Carter"...
- Image captions that are complete sentences need a period.
- "he had become a runt." excuse my ignorance but I'm not sure what that means, is runt of use?
- Reworded. Done CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure about five columns for refs, one or two (max) is fine.
- Actually, I'm using the |colwidth parameter rather than a hard number of columns. Setting the number of columns can cause problems for certain users, and is unflexible. By setting the column width, it will automatically display a different number of columns depending on your screen width and resolution. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Check ISBNs are either italics or not (I suggest not) but not a mix.
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to look over this. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)