Wikipedia:Peer review/Brooks & Dunn/archive1

Brooks & Dunn

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've looking for suggestions to improve the article. This has long been on my to-do list, but with B&D as one of the biggest acts in country music history, I'd love for them to be at least GA level. I've structured the article like I have other country music GAs such as Joe Diffie, Clay Walker, Shenandoah (band) and Montgomery Gentry.

Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments good news – some comments. Bad news – I know nothing about the subject matter, so please excuse my ignorance...

" They were paired by record ..." do you mean the producer "manufactured" the group by putting these two together?
"Brooks wrote songs ..." but then just a passing note that Dunn charted two singles...

That's because Dunn was comparatively less active in the 80s.

"the duo recorded ten studio albums" would prefer to read "Brooks & Dunn recorded ten studio albums"
Our B. W. article has a space between B and W.
"Arista Nashville" was previously (and exclusively) referred to as "Arista Records".

Because they didn't move to Arista Nashville until 1996.

"1990-2010" en-dash per WP:DASH required.
"Ronnie Dunn" not exactly an informative caption...
"b-side" I thought that was usually "B-side"?

I've never gotten an answer on that.

"it was led off by its title track, which peaked at number 4" what does "it was led off" mean? and number 4 -> number four.

I was told that "Number 4" vs. "Number four" are both correct, as long as the article is consistent between which of the two it uses. Chart positions can use digits.

"Kix Brooks" similar comment about WP:CAPTION.
"these songs[…]with " spaces before and after the captured ellipsis.
In the refs, don't mix formats for the same kind of date, i.e. don't have yyyy-mm-dd and mm, dd, yyyy for publication date.
Be consistent with the presentation of CMT. Is it CMT or CMT?
Surprised the majority of dates are dmy when this is a US article, would have thought mdy would prevail, but as long as you're consistent......

The Rambling Man (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]