Wikipedia:Peer review/Bryce Dallas Howard/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
My first time setting up a peer review. I've listed this article for peer review because it is a well-written article, it's at a good article status and I made a few contributions on it, but it may need some clean up on grammar and some quote check up on sections, including "Career", so we can make it a featured article candidate, as suggested on WP:FILM.
Thanks, BattleshipMan (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
@BattleshipMan: This PR has been open since January and unfortunately, it has not received any comments yet. Are you still interested in receiving comments? If so, I suggest seeking out a featured article mentor who can give some comments here on how to get ready for FAC. You can also post at interested Wikiprojects such as WP:WIG or WP:FILMBIO. I also suggest that you review some featured article candidates: this will help you get to know the FA criteria and build goodwill among FAC reviewers. If you are not interested, can you close this PR? Z1720 (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I notified Wikipedia:GOCE to help out with that article to make it FAC. So what do you think I should do about this PR until then? BattleshipMan (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I highly recommend WP:FAM. While GOCE is fantastic at fixing grammar and flow, they do not usually consider the content within the article or reference structure. A mentor from this subject area will highlight information that is missing from the article and minor MOS problems that can ultimately cause an FAC to not be promoted. If you have trouble finding a mentor, post a note in WT:FAC and hopefully you will get a response there. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, then. Once someone in GOCE fixes the grammar and flow soon, I go to WP:FAM. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: It has been another month, and I do not see the article at WP:GOCER. When PRs are open too long, they are less likely to receive comments. Can we close this PR, and reopen it when the GOCE is complete? Z1720 (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- GOCE did fix the grammar on that article awhile ago. But I couldn't find anyone available of FAM. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: I suggest posting a request at WP:FAC, as many experienced FA writers watchlist that page. You can also try posting a request on Wikiproject talk pages. Z1720 (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I set up the request to WP:FAC now. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: I have just realised that I put WP:FAC instead of WT:FAC, like I intended. By posting your article on WP:FAC, this will nominate the article for an FA. Is this what you wanted? If so, then you will need to close this PR as a FAC and PR cannot be open at the same time. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Z1720: Yes, let's close it. BattleshipMan (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: I have just realised that I put WP:FAC instead of WT:FAC, like I intended. By posting your article on WP:FAC, this will nominate the article for an FA. Is this what you wanted? If so, then you will need to close this PR as a FAC and PR cannot be open at the same time. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I set up the request to WP:FAC now. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: I suggest posting a request at WP:FAC, as many experienced FA writers watchlist that page. You can also try posting a request on Wikiproject talk pages. Z1720 (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- GOCE did fix the grammar on that article awhile ago. But I couldn't find anyone available of FAM. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @BattleshipMan: It has been another month, and I do not see the article at WP:GOCER. When PRs are open too long, they are less likely to receive comments. Can we close this PR, and reopen it when the GOCE is complete? Z1720 (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, then. Once someone in GOCE fixes the grammar and flow soon, I go to WP:FAM. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I highly recommend WP:FAM. While GOCE is fantastic at fixing grammar and flow, they do not usually consider the content within the article or reference structure. A mentor from this subject area will highlight information that is missing from the article and minor MOS problems that can ultimately cause an FAC to not be promoted. If you have trouble finding a mentor, post a note in WT:FAC and hopefully you will get a response there. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)