Wikipedia:Peer review/Carmen/archive2
An older peer review can be found at Wikipedia:Peer review/Carmen/archive1
I would eventually like this page to be an FA candidate, are there any issues? (Other than a lack of pictures). --Alexs letterbox 04:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- I quickly scanned the article and have some comments:
- notes: The link to the second note doesn't work; the labels probably don't match. More notes would be better. Consider searching for the sentences containing the word most or words ending with -est to see if there is a way to justify these claims with a footnote and reference.
- links: You did a good job with your article linking and avoided over-linking. I don't care for red links and you avoided an excessive number of these also. In the few cases where there are red links, verify that there likely will be future articles on those topics and they will likely have the titles used in your links.
- I also fixed a minor punctuation problem. JonHarder 00:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)