Wikipedia:Peer review/Chef (South Park)/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it's informative, well-written, well-interlinked with other articles, and well-referenced. I can't find any problems with it myself, and believe it is Featured Article material.
Thanks, Arran64 (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- The article is missing info on merchandise and on some cultural references. Nergaal (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- According to checklinks (click "external links" in the toolbox to the right), there are a number of bad external links. Allens (talk | contribs) 00:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments
- The IPA (I think!) is only a pronunciation of his surname which is a little odd.
- Should the article be forced to display a title of "Chef (South Park)"?
- Don't think you necessarily need to link out to music in the 1970s.
- I would state that the show uses "cutout animation" rather than just assume we'll guess it.
- First sentence of Character section is 58 words long consider chopping it up a bit!
- "... pejorative "crackers", including the children." ref?
- "(and in a few other instances" not keen on "a few".
- Last three sentences of Character section are unreferenced.
- No fair use rationale in place for use of File:Chocolate Salty Balls.jpg.
- Don't link the word "album", it's commonplace.
- "reached #1 in" don't use "hash" to represent "number" in prose.
- "(an unsubtle jab at Scientology)." we both know that's true but (a) that's not neutral or elegant prose (b) it's not referenced.
- Don't link "lightning", commonplace.
- really dead[28]). -> move the ref to after the full stop.
- "having never met the man" -> "never having met Chef"
- Ref 3 needs fixing, both format and dead-wise.
- And ref 6.
- And refs 4 and 5 are tagged as dead.
- What makes collegeprowler.com a reliable source?
- Same question for www.everwonder.com?
- Ref 22 needs to be appropriately formatted.
- Ref 25 incomplete in format and claims to be dead.
- Don't mix date formats in the refs.
- Ref 26 is missing date/accessdate info.
- Ref 29 is incomplete, but we don't use IMDB as it's not a reliable source.