Wikipedia:Peer review/Clinton Presidential Center/archive1

Clinton Presidential Center

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see what I still need to do to improve it to GA. I started working on this about a week and a half ago (from when I requested this review) because I saw that several other presidential libraries are good articles and that it seemed like a future candidate for a good topic. This particular one was rather short, and I've expanded it and tried to find sources for every statement. Any suggestions on what to do next would be appreciated greatly, I'm trying to find information about the exhibits at present.

Thanks,  fetchcomms☛ 04:40, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

• Comment - So far the article is looking great, well referenced, good structure, and it covers the topic fairly well. I've upgraded it to B-class for now. Thanks for your work on it Fetchcomms. -Coffee // have a cup // ark // 16:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

• Comment - The article, as Coffee gave it, is probably B class worthy. To get it to GA, I strongly suggest adding more content. Some of the sections are really slim. For example, the Anniversary and Environmental impact sections are only a few sentences in total. Adding more content would add needed depth for a GA. It's on the right track though. No problems I can see from a brief skimming over with the referencing and citations, which is good. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks both for your input. I'll try and find more information to add!  fetchcomms☛ 21:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, are all of the external links necessary? It's nice to keep them to a minimum, and I can't tell if they all apply. Just a thought. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I've listed only the official sites of each major part of the library, but I'll remove the store link because that's not really as important.  fetchcomms☛ 00:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)