Wikipedia:Peer review/Columbia University/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to get it up to featured article quality eventually.
Thanks, alphalfalfa(talk) 02:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Comments from Yeeno
[edit]At first glance, per MOS:CITELEAD, you might want to look at (re)moving some of the citations in the lead, if they cite information that is repeated in the body. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments from Z1720
[edit]Hey, some passing comments after a skim:
- MOS:SANDWICH needs to be removed
- The transportation section has no citations.
- Every paragraph should end with a citation, minimum.
- What makes this (ref 40) a high-quality source? If it is not high-quality, remove it
- This is a very large article. Consider summarizing some sections, removing unnecessary information, or WP:SPINOUT sections of the article.
- Normally, I would recommend an FA article to serve as your template for improvements, but it looks like an article on a higher-ed institution hasn't passed FAC since 2009, and standards were a lot different back then. Amador Valley High School is a highschool that has been recently identified as meeting FA standards; I suggest reading it to get a sense of what an FA based on a school would look like.
I hope this helps! Z1720 (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)