Wikipedia:Peer review/Divine (performer)/archive1

Divine (performer)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has recently had a lot of work done to it, and ideally I would like it to attain GA status fairly soon. Before that can be achieved however, it would be great it someone else couldtake a look at this and let me know what they think! Thanks in advance!

Thanks, Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This looks a great effort, and I am surprised that nobody from the showbiz/film projects, or LGBT, has picked it up. So I will do my best. It may take me a while because I am tied up with other things, but I'll leave a note on my talkpage inviting any casual readers to comment on it. You may get lucky! Brianboulton (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've not had time to look at the prose yet, but there are a few issues concerning sources and references:

Is http://www.dreamlandnews.com/divine/interview.shtml a high quality reliable source?
There are currently 2 "citation needed" tags
There are a couple of other instances in the article of paragraphs ending without citations
~~Ref 162 is a dead link~~
- - It works fine for me; I'm using Mozilla Firefox, if that helps? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Refs 17 and 19: judging by your general practice, the "p." should be a "pp."~~
Some of the page ranges have hyphens that should be ndashes
Retrieval dates should be uniform (compare, e.g. refs 149 and 153; there are other discrepancies)
Some retrieval dates appear to be missing, e.g. refs 152, 160, 161 and maybe others
Page number required for ref 157. Check for others
~~Should the Mallory Curley book have an IBSN?~~
- - Unfortunately I have been able to locate the ISBN of this tome; it is even absent from the amazon.com page. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brian, when I have a bit more spare time I shall fix all of these errors! Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let me know when you're done and I'll continue with the review Brianboulton (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]