Wikipedia:Peer review/Doukhobors/archive1

Doukhobors

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get feedback on WP:MOS issues and references after a failed GAN (I've tried to implement the feedback as much as possible, but need some advice).

Thanks, DoggieTimesTwo 04:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Chidgk1

I sympathise - the Harvard refs are really fiddly to do. If you install User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors it will help you see which are wrong.

Optionally installing User:Headbomb/unreliable will show ref 6 as a probable unreliable source in red and 2 possibles in yellow

"ethno-confessional" is a difficult word for the second sentence

Some links in "see also" can be deleted from there and put in the main text - like Doukhobor Russian can be deleted from "see also" as already in text

If you have time it would be great if you could you write a word or two on Wikipedia:Peer review/Greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey/archive3

That article uses Harvard referencing - if you cannot follow it please ask

Chidgk1 (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]