Wikipedia:Peer review/Film colorization/archive2

Film colorization

Okay, much has been done since the last peer review, and I'd like some thoughts on how or if the article has been improved since then, and what more can be done with it in its current state. (Ibaranoff24 17:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I think the lede discusses the technical aspects rather more than the controversy, which was rather notable. The sentence about reasons and controversy also seems vague. I think at least some of the reason should be enumerated, and at least a sentence discuss the controversy. Goldfritha 18:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The footnotes need formatting using the correct citation templates.
Lead needs expanding.
Several paragraphs are unreferenced.
External links need cleaning up.
'Integration', 'Restoration' and 'Documentary make-overs' sections are too short.

— Wackymacs 09:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]