Wikipedia:Peer review/Funeral for Yesterday/archive4
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because... Trying to get it to GA/FA status (i messed up the peer review so i have to redo it) Look for:
- Does it read fairly and unbiased?
- Is the structure of the page good or bad?
- Is the recording/production read okay?
- Any typos and errors?
- Any further things that need to be pointed out?
Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- A few notes:
- I don't see any NPOV issues.
- Layout looks good.
- As far as GACR goes, the article appears to be sufficiently broad in scope and in depth.
- From a cursory look, the sourcing looks fine.
- I recommend giving the article another copy edit and then requesting a copy edit at GOCER before nominating this for GA/FA.
- The free use rationale for the audio snippet could be a bit more detailed.
- There appears to be a bit over overlinking going on (e.g., cease and desist, retainer agreement, and groping).
- voorts (talk/contributions) 00:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- thank you. Chchcheckit (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)