Wikipedia:Peer review/Georgia (country)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of a possible GA application.
Thanks, kazekagetr 17:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments from Burklemore1
[edit]G'day, this is actually my first time peer reviewing an article, so sorry that I won't be able to cover the more complex problems that experienced reviewers can trace.
- I have looked and seen four "citation needed" tags. These will need to be covered immediately if you want to nominate this for GA.
- Even where citation tags are not placed, more sources will be needed. I have viewed many sentences with no sources, unless these statements can actually be found in other sources, so it's best to tag them where unsourced sentences can be found.
- To me, the lead may need a bit of expansion, although you don't need to do this if you feel like the summary provides a good amount of coverage.
- I have counted 17 dead links in the reference section, so new links will be needed to replace them.
- The reference scrollbox should be removed. I have never seen this used in any article until now so I believe this is unnecessary.
- The external link list is too excessive. I suggest removing some links (see Australia for a good example, but you don't have to follow this if there are some exceptions).
- There is a possibility of use of weasel words, so a thorough search is recommended.
- I haven't noticed any major grammatical errors and such, but you could try out a copyedit just to be safe for GA review.
That's seems to be all from me, so I would suggest waiting for another reviewer to address issues section by section. Burklemore1 (talk) 22:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)