Wikipedia:Peer review/Half-Life 2: Episode One/archive1
Appearance
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to bring it to FA status one day. Gary King (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Boy, don't sound so glum... "one day..." :P Images:
- Image:Half-Life 2 Episode One Citadel Base.jpg can use a {{Non-free image rationale}} like those at Image:Plante firstmask.jpg to reduce redundancies in the templates.
- The cover should be reduced in size to 256 px width. Otherwise they meet criteria. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King (talk) 21:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- On a side note, you might want to beef up the rationales, especially the gameplay image- how does it increase our understanding fo the work? The barebones one-liner wouldn't satisfy Elco, so just be warned :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King (talk) 21:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Can you add any more information to ref #29, such as author or page number? Same with ref #33, #41.
- Otherwise, sources look good. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't have access to those at the moment. I'll see if I can, and then add them when I get them. Gary King (talk) 02:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "in and around the war-torn city of City 17" - avoid repetition of city. Giggy (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've done some light editing (rm overlinking, et al), and also left some inline comments. Check my edits; I had to edit an old copy offline, so I might have reverted some recent changes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll look it over tomorrow (because I'm tired right now) and then get back to you on here. Gary King (talk) 03:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Alright I think I've addressed all of your concerns. Gary King (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that looks better. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Alright I think I've addressed all of your concerns. Gary King (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll look it over tomorrow (because I'm tired right now) and then get back to you on here. Gary King (talk) 03:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)