Wikipedia:Peer review/Hollaback Girl/archive4
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it has had a tumultuous history with GAs, FAs, and PRs. I have recently been improving this article and would like to see how far away it is from a good article, as I also wish to restore the good topic Love. Angel. Music. Baby.
Thanks in advance to whoever takes this up, Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 18:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've updated the infobox as per template guidance (easier than listing here). —Ojorojo (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! Do you see any other problems with the article? Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 15:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)- The article has quite a FA & GA history. There's a lot to take in and probably should have an expert or two to comment. Sometimes the Guild of Copy Editors is helpful. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Funnily enough, I happen to be a GOCE member. I'll probably take a thorough look through the article soon. Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 17:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 
Done (should have probably added that earlier). Anything else that needs work? Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 16:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)- Well, considering the inactivity, I am going to end this peer review and take this article to GAN. User:Thatone
weirdwikier | Oh, Toodles! 10:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Funnily enough, I happen to be a GOCE member. I'll probably take a thorough look through the article soon. Thatone
- The article has quite a FA & GA history. There's a lot to take in and probably should have an expert or two to comment. Sometimes the Guild of Copy Editors is helpful. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! Do you see any other problems with the article? Thatone
