Wikipedia:Peer review/Horizon Air destinations/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking for suggestions before sending this article to WP:FLC. I know I am not the best writer, and the prose in the lead will probably need some work, but any input on the table or citations would also be helpful.
Thanks, Admrboltz (talk) 21:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments
This is the first list of its kind that I have encountered, so I haven't got anything relevant to compare it with. The first thing that struck me was that the table is pretty uninformative.
- Should you not mention in the lead that Horizon Air is based at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport?
- Would it not be possible to give, for each of the destinations listed, the following information:-
- Date of inauguration of service (I know some indication of this is given in the lead, but the table should list precise dates)
- Number of scheduled flights daily
- Passenger numbers (monthly averages, perhaps)?
- The "notes" section of the table is pretty devoid of information; I'm a bit surprised there's so little to say. What does "Hub" mean, by the way?
- Could there be more images - a shot of Seattle-Tacoma airport, perhaps, or something else directly relevant to Horizon?
In general, then, I'd say that this list is at a fairly early stage of development, and needs more added to it before it can be considered as complete. Brianboulton (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- I know its a first of its kind, I am kind of good at that. I started the whole List of Opening Day Starting Pitchers... thing. I will incorporate your suggestions about Sea-Tac in the Lead, as well but with the date of service, number of flights and passenger count, I think that would violate WP:NOTTRAVEL. Also trying to cite service dates would be very challenging. Hub will be defined, but I can remove the notes field and use footnotes to notate hub, EAS and seasonal service, etc, would that work better? Thanks! --Admrboltz (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)