Wikipedia:Peer review/I Need You (album)/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to a GA status and would like some input on it beforehand.
Thanks, Swifty*talkcontribs 11:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Note to nominator: This is your second nomination for 7 December; WP:PR rules allow only one per day from a single nominator - please bear that in mind for the future. Brianboulton (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comments
- Infobox - "1999–02" should really be "1999–2002".
- "The album was also compared to Faith Hill's album, Breathe (1999)." is this relevant in the lead? And what were the results of the comparison?
- "certified gold" or "certified Gold"? Be internally consistent.
- Why don't "You Are" and "Soon" have articles?
- "between the years 1999 and 2001" no need for "the years".
- "At the time, during the litigation with her label" not sure you need "At the time" here at all.
- "Rimes was asking " Rimes asked.
- "The 2001 release of the album" repetitive from previous sentence. Suggest a merge "... Curb Records, and featured..."
- "of four minutes and fifty-eight seconds" + "duration".
- "a ballad[23] song" don't need "song" here.
- "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " followed by "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " repetitive.
- "that Rimes "comfortably adopting some..." not grammatically correct.
- "saying that "The good" no need for that here.
- "-- " replace with an en-dash.
- "two and a half" usually see this hyphenated.
- "did quite well on" reads too colloquially, perhaps "peformed well".
- "it fell to" -> "falling to".
- "Internationally the album did quite well" ditto as above comment.
- "as high as number five" just "at number five" will do.
- "Year-end" any need for that Y to be capitalised?
- "as well as four other countries" the RIAA isn't a country. Perhaps "as well as in four other contries" or "as well as four other organizations".
- Year-end charts table sorts strangely because the 2002 heading moves...
- Sales/shipments column doesn't sort correctly.
- Don't mix date formats in refs (e.g. ref 30, 34 etc).