Wikipedia:Peer review/Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to ensure that readers see it as neutral and factual.
It's important that Victorians are away of the state's anti-corruption agency and I'm seeking any edits to make the content easier to understand.
Thanks, Michael.social (talk) 04:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comments from Tom (LT)
Thanks for your edits to this article, Michael.social. It's great to have another editor on board.
I suggest some edits to make this article more like other Wikipedia articles in style and tone:
- Firstly, I suggest including more secondary sources - I notice a lot of primary sources are used in this article (see the essay WP:USINGPRIMARY for more details)
- I suggest including more WP:WIKILINKs to other related articles so readers can continue to explore this topic
- I suggest writing in a more discursive fashion, instead of just writing as lists
- I suggest including a section on public reception and criticism, which is very important to wikipedia articles
I hope this helps. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)