Wikipedia:Peer review/Ionization cone/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because... I've expanded this article from just two sentences to a pretty decent coverage of this topic. Looking to find more sources to expand the content (especially in the characteristics section), improve the writing style & the lead, and get it to B-class or potentially GA (or see if it already qualifies for one of those two). Thanks! Quaemenelimbus (🗨 here) ^_^ 21:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Comments from Z1720
[edit]@Quaemenelimbus: Comments after a quick skim. In general, I think this article needs more information. Try looking for more sources on WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, WP:RS/P, and your local library system. Avoid the one-paragraph sections and either expand upon them or merge sections together. I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)