Wikipedia:Peer review/Jack White/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it is a stone's throw from being ready for GA consideration, but I really need inside input, since I am the primary editor, and really don't have much outside perspective. I've read this article so many times, I'm cross-eyed. I'm still working on finding references for the the fact-tagged statements. I also know some of the references need a touch more formatting help (which another editor and I made A LOT of progress on this week). Otherwise, any other things that could be fixed or improved, I just need a second set of eyes.
Thanks, Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)