Wikipedia:Peer review/John Adams/archive1
Article may have POV issues and lacks inline citations. It's marked as A class, however. Suggestions for improving subjective language and rewording would be very helpful. The article seems to rely very heavily on sensationalism and is not an encyclopedic presentation of facts - rather it is an historical interpretation. Not a very good one at that since it uses too few sources to be a decent historical interpretation. Any suggestions on how to make it encyclopedic would be helpful. --Strothra 22:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 23:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)