Wikipedia:Peer review/John Neal (writer)/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I made some substantial additions to the article today after doing considerable research and having a friend edit the article for readability. I believe it is now of higher quality than the C Class it was last assigned. If it is not yet worthy of Feature Article status, I would like to hear what changes are needed to get there. The history of John Neal is very dear to me.
Thanks so much for your help! —Dugan Murphy (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- This is great! And a really entertaining article. What a character! I can safely say this is likely to sail past a GA review and suggest you iron out things like citation style, phrasing etc. at a featured article review. I can't see any major problems with writing style, images, citations, content or broadness - other than to say I feel it's written in a very readable but neutral manner with some fantastic images backing it up. Good luck!
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck! |