I've listed this article for peer review because I think I have a reasonable chance at making this GA. Since he's probably the biggest artist I've ever taken an interest in on Wikipedia, aside from maybe Fall Out Boy, I think maybe I should get some PR feedback first, if this process still even works. Don't fail me now.
@DannyMusicEditor looks good - have read through the article, it's well-sourced, images are appropriate, and text is easy to read. Looks appropriately comprehensive. Can't see any major things that you'll have to improve befor nominating, so I'd encourage you to just nominate. looks like you've had to wait long time enough for this! Let me know if there's any specific areas you have questions about or want me to comment on. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Tom (LT)! I only went here first because the article is very high-profile and I have virtually no experience editing hip hop articles at this level of Wikipedia. But, if you say this article is on great shape, I'll trust your judgment! dannymusiceditoroops04:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyMusicEditor you're welcome! I've reviewed like 80 to 90 GAs, so hopefully I have some idea :). PS would you mind picking a peer review on WP:PRWAITING and having a look? Fresh eyes are always welcome and that might help someone else have a more prompt review. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!
