Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/List of North Korean propaganda slogans/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm trying to make it a featured list, but I'm not sure what else I need to do besides adding more prose and background, as the list itself is essentially complete.

Thanks, OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some feedback:
  • The anti-capitalism subsection has no reference.
  • The recurring themes section doesn't need those two subsection headers imo; both are too short. Just have the section without the headers
  • The first sentence should just use the WP:COMMONNAME for the country: "Within North Korea, propaganda...". Concision.
  • I don't think "propagation" can be used like that in the first sentence. Think you could reword it to "propaganda slogans are an important aspect of propaganda in North Korea". Then remove the see also section per WP:NOTSEEALSO.
  • The second photo is squeezing the table a bit. It's also not a very good photo (far away). I'd recommend you just remove it altogether.
  • 수령결사옹위 row doesn't have a reference.
  • References need to be better formatted.
  • You don't need "Note:" in the note.
seefooddiet (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did just about everything. However, I'm a little confused by the second to last bullet about the references. Does that mean I need to find a wider variety of references, or is it a matter of having to edit the code? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should have been clearer. It's good practice to:
  • Add access dates for online materials; link rot is a growing issue nowadays
  • Wikilink publication names when possible
  • Standardize use of MOS:DATEFORMAT; there are currently DMY and MDY dates both used in the article. You should pick one of the two and be consistent. Should ideally place {{Use dmy dates}} or {{Use mdy dates}} on the article too (just below the short description).
  • Some of the refs are lacking possible information; notably the last one and the Uriminzokkiri one.
  • There's a deadlink that should be replaced
There's probably more that can be said too, this was just quick feedback. I recommend you look at WP:FA-level articles to see how they handle references. Something that uses news and online articles. seefooddiet (talk) 08:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One other unrelated note, make sure all the capitalization abides by MOS:PEOPLETITLES. seefooddiet (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]