Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Ring of Honor employees/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for February 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like this page to become a featured list. I think it has the qualities to become a featured list if not now then in the future.
Ruhrfisch comments: While it is clear a lot of work has been done on this article, much more is needed before it is close to ready for FLC. Here are some suggestions for improvement.
- The article has no inline references. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
- Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. {{cite web}} and other cite templates may be helpful. See WP:CITE and WP:V
- The article has a one sentence lead. The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way. Please see WP:LEAD
- The article needs to provide context for the reader - the lead should do this on the Ring of Honor itself, and the Notes should do this for individual wrestlers. Would it be possible to give the years the wrestler has been active, for example? This seems to be a list of current employees only - again needs to be made clear.
- Any free images that could be included?
- Are all of the "Other Personnel" notable?
- Any third-party independent sources to cite?
- A model FL is useful - there are many Professional Wrestling FL lists at Wikipedia:FL#Sports_and_recreation. I can see a list of champions, but is a list of all employees really notable?
Please see WP:LEAD Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 22:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)