Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coaches/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I would like to get this to FL status but I'm a little worried it might be too short for that. Obviously I'd to know if there is anything eles I need to fix too.
Thanks, Buc (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Yes it's a little short but it doesn't mean it wouldn't stand a chance at FLC. It is, after all, comprehensive.
- Of the 7 Buccaneers - seven.
- You could specify (and link to) the precise Superbowl in the lead.
- Probably ought to cite the claim that three coaches were former players and the firing claim too.
- " This trade came after Dungy was fired after the Buccaneers has lost in the playoffs to the Eagles for the second year in a row and because it was determined that the offence Dungy ran was too inconsistent and he was unable to win in the playoffs." - too long, doesn't make sense to me (...has lost in the playoffs...?)
- Removed, only put this in to bump up the word count in order to pass it for DYK. Buc (talk) 18:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- "dispite" typo.
- Colour should not be the only way of identifying a property - see WP:COLOR. Use an asterisk, dagger etc to also denote coaches spending their entire career with the Bucs.
- Footnotes and References can be merged into a single References section with your current Footnotes being "Specific" and your current References being "General".
- What make JT-SW.com a reliable source?
- Hickok Sports. or Hickok Sports.com?
- Be consistent with the use of either
workorpublisherin the references.
That's about it. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I would add a content for references under the foot notes content. The bulleted list at the end are not foot notes, but references for the article.
- Remove foot note five (Spent entire professional head coaching career with Buccaneers ). There is no reason to point this out since the table is already coded for this information.