Wikipedia:Peer review/List of bridges in Montreal/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know what still needs to be done to get this listed as a Featured List. Pictures of the three east-end bridges and the tunnel will be added as soon as the weather allows me to take good pictures.
Thanks, Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- Avoid stating the obvious, i.e. the very first sentence re-states the title of the page
- Avoid bolded links, i.e. Bridge
- WP:LEAD section should be expanded. It's too short now.
- Create a new section titled Key and list what the colors mean.
- Also, WP:COLOR should not be the only indicator, try using symbols along with the colors.
- A section heading should not be inside of the table, take all three out.
- There should be no links in those section titles.
- There should be a lot more references than what you have now.
- References should be cited with complete info, i.e. publisher, date of publishing, access date.
- All the comments in the table should be cited separately.