Wikipedia:Peer review/Live from Paris (Shakira album)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this is the first live album article I plan to GA nominate, and I think it would be better to solve all problems in a friendly PR before the main nomination.
Thanks, WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi there. I read through the article and it looks pretty good, but here are few things that you can do to improve it:
- The article makes reference to Shakira's official website but doesn't mention the website's name. Can you add that?
- The name of the site is Shakira.com. Does it need anything more than that? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Probably not. --1ST7 (talk) 23:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- The name of the site is Shakira.com. Does it need anything more than that? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- "Carlos Quintana from About.com gave the DVD an extremely positive review..." It's better to use the word "very" rather than "extremely".
- Done! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- "Noting them to be reflective..." Wikipedia:Words to watch discourages using "note" or any of its variants as a synonym for "said".
- Replaced! Thanks for telling me too. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- This phrasing is a little awkward: "found the video versions much impressive..." Do you mean "much more"?
- Lol this sentence is so funny must admit! I'm almost tempted to leave it that way --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please mention that Adam Markovitz is from Entertainment Weekly.
- Mentioned. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- --1ST7 (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help! Also, in your opinion, does this article lack proper coverage? Should I add a synopsis section? I've seen a video article like Britney Spears: In the Zone which doesn't. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I don't think a synopsis section is necessary for this to pass the GA review, though it would be an improvement to the article for it to have more coverage. --1ST7 (talk) 23:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Information on Live from Paris is very limited and this was all I could find. I think it is enough. Shall I nominate it now? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- It looks ready, in my opinion. Good luck! --1ST7 (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- It looks ready, in my opinion. Good luck! --1ST7 (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Information on Live from Paris is very limited and this was all I could find. I think it is enough. Shall I nominate it now? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I don't think a synopsis section is necessary for this to pass the GA review, though it would be an improvement to the article for it to have more coverage. --1ST7 (talk) 23:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help! Also, in your opinion, does this article lack proper coverage? Should I add a synopsis section? I've seen a video article like Britney Spears: In the Zone which doesn't. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)