Wikipedia:Peer review/Lost (season 5)/archive1

Lost (season 5)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This needs to go through here to get to FTC. Thanks, –thedemonhog talk • edits 21:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

For more out-of-universe writing, "A few days earlier" should be "A few episodes earlier" in the Cast section.
As I have expressed in the Lost WP, Kristin of E! has proven in the last two seasons that most of her information are just her guesses, and bad guesses at that. She never cites her sources (unless she interviews Darlton of course) and her judgement is clouded by vendettas against certain actors/characters. I cannot, in good faith, let her pass as a reliable source.
Got more ref info about June 16, 2008 Issue of The Dominion Post. for Gaunt's return, even if it's just a link to a fan post? Because that info is new to me (or I just have a poor memory).
Ref 22 says Sonya Walger is likely to return, but the wiki article drops the "likely".
Ref 25 is about last season, and we can't extrapolate from the writers' season 4 plan to what will happen in season 5.
Maybe mention that an ARG is going on (has it been stated that it leads up to S5 like the last ARG did?)
That's all I can find, and I am pretty much up-to-date with Lost stuff

– sgeureka ^t•c 22:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job finding the reference #22 inconsistency. ;) I have continued the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lost#Spoiler policy. I could link to this, but that would be a violation of Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works. Since I was gone for five weeks, I do not really know what is going on with the ARG and am yet to catch-up on it. Diff. –thedemonhog talk • edits 18:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This may seem a tad nit-picky but can we really call Richard Alpert "ageless"? I mean, it's Lost, the answer is not always the obvious one. For all we know, at this point, he's a time traveller or something. Maybe put "apparently" before the word ageless. -- ^[User]Jamie JCA_[Talk] 23:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks, –thedemonhog talk • edits 18:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The first two paragraphs in Cast are gigantic. Please divide.
Ref number 9 needs a subscriber access, I'm pretty sure this should be mentioned somewhere. Pie is good ^{(Apple is the best)} 01:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That citation has been removed. –thedemonhog talk • edits 23:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]