Wikipedia:Peer review/Luís Figo/archive1
Appearance
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i think that this is a good articule.
Thanks, Sdrtirs (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
[edit]Indeed, a good article but plenty of room for improvement.
"considered by some second only to Eusebio as Portugal’s greatest player ever" in the lead. Without citation, and then not in the main article. This is WP:OR I'm afraid unless you can cite it.Golden Boy in the lead points to a disambiguation page, and is never discussed again so needs citation and disambiguation."exceptional trickery " in the lead needs evidence otherwise it's too much of a point of view.en-dash should be used for season separation, e.g. 1998–99 instead of 1998-99.Be consistent with the way seasons are represented - use en-dash instead of slash.- Simply not enough references - seven for a player like this? I'd expect 70... Plus use the {{cite web}} template.
Avoid in-line linking like the link to antifigo.com.The bullet point list of successes is not good - prose is generally the way foreward. However, the bogus struck through text should go no matter what!
A lot of work to do before the article can progress, most importantly with referencing the claims in the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)