Wikipedia:Peer review/MTR/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I need feedback on what could be considered as remotely wrong with this article; also because the quality has to be kept up due to its FA status.
Thanks, Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 10:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jc86035. I'm just off for a wikibreak, but here's my two cents:
- lead
- See WP:PERCENT
- Initial proposal
- Are refs 6 & 10 large enough to need page numbers?
- Two paras don't end in an inline reference
Modified Initial System
- I see only two references, again paras don't end in an inline reference
- Line extensions
- Under referenced (only to ref 12)
- Airport connection
- references
- the in-town check-ins offers a more convenient and time-saving routine; a free shuttle bus service transports travellers from these stations to their respective hotels as well.? I'm not sure about the phrasing of this.
- Again WP:PERCENT
- Tseung Kwan O Line
- The tried-and-true cross-platform interchange arrangement is repeated here. Opinion? Ref?
- West Rail Line
- Refs?
- Interchange stations
- Only one reference. Note 1 also needs a reference
- Ma On Shan Line
- Unreferenced section
- Disneyland extension
- The3.5–kilometre needs a convert template; this will sort out the unneeded ndash
- the carriages were changed from the existing M-Train rolling stock to match the recreational and adventurous nature of the 3.5-minute journey ? please expand on the recreational and adventurous nature
- Lok Ma Chau Spur Line
- Empty section
- Privatisation and merger
- refs for the first two and last two paragraphs
- Tseung Kwan O Spur Line
- Empty section
- Infrastructure/Network
Why do we have track gauges of 1435 and 1432 mm?Apparently the track gauge for the MTR network differs from that of the ex-KCR network by 3mm. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 03:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)The details in the information template of the map are out of date (date says 2009/image says 2014)This image has been updated by me and User:Sameboat already. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 03:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Control Centres/Depots/MTR bus
- All unreferenced sections; consider Control centres
- Station facilities, amenities and services
- I did a source check on this paragraph; it has one 2009 source (up-to-date?), and I'm not seeing anything the reference with backs up the text to .. disabled friendly; this statement alone is an opinion that needs a 3rd party ref
- In-station and on-train announcements
- unreferenced section
- Public toilet installation concerns
- This could be condensed
- In-station commerce and journals
- unreferenced section
- Future expansions
- Other people disagree, but I think this should be called something like Planned expansions, as we have no reliable sources for the future
- Rolling stock
- what does p/h/d mean?
- One of the cars only carry luggages ?
- There is a name column in the table, but the headings in the sections below are different (e.g. Metro Cammell EMU(DC) and M Stock)
- Flags in the table (I'll check this)
- Adtranz-CAF EMU, CNR EMU, SP1900/1950 EMU and Metro Cammell EMU(AC) are unreferenced
- Fares and tickets
- Second para on ticket prices needs a reference (and also a date)
- Final para needs a reference
- Octopus cards
- references
- Tourist pass
- Unreferenced section
Skipped a few sections here
- references
- refs 34, 36, 37, 39, 48, 49 are raw urls and need formatting with titles etc. 48/49 are youtube videos and don't appear reliable sources. Other sources need dates and publishers
- In summary sourcing is my main concern; on the one spot check the ref didn't mention everything that was being referenced. Edgepedia (talk) 11:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- I did some work last year adding references to the London Underground article, and I was able to borrow a couple of books from the library for the history. Is there not anything similar for the MTR? 12:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- My reading of the section paragraph of MOS:FLAG is that we don't need flags in the table, as they don't actually represent that country, government, or nationality. Made some changes for clarity.Edgepedia (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback! Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 03:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- My reading of the section paragraph of MOS:FLAG is that we don't need flags in the table, as they don't actually represent that country, government, or nationality. Made some changes for clarity.Edgepedia (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- I did some work last year adding references to the London Underground article, and I was able to borrow a couple of books from the library for the history. Is there not anything similar for the MTR? 12:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)