Wikipedia:Peer review/Makwerekwere/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am planning to put for GA nomination and would appreciate suggestions for improvement or maybe even expansion Thanks, FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Liu1126
[edit]I'll be doing this review in bits and pieces due to my schedule (that's allowed, right?), so I'll be making piecemeal comments over the next few days. Don't bother to wait until I'm done, feel free to fix anything I mention along the way. Liu1126 (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sources There are a couple sources that seem a bit dubious. Could you demonstrate their reliability or replace them with other sources?
- From what I gathered, LitCharts is somewhat similar to SparkNotes, which lacks consensus on its reliability at WP:RSP.
- The GraduateWay source appears to be a sample paper without an identifiable author. Consequently, I don't think this meets the requirements of WP:SCHOLARSHIP and may even be WP:RS/SPS.
- Khanya seems to be a personal blog, and I couldn't confirm if the blogger is an expert in the field, so I'd say this source fails WP:RS/SPS.
- The bracketed word (pictured) in the image caption is probably unnecessary.
- I don't see how Yabancı in the "See also" section is related to the article.
- thanks for having a look and comments. I will remove the challenged sources or seek alternatives. Yabancı is the same slang in Turkish FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I see. In that case, it might be better to link to the Wiktionary entry yabancı instead, since readers might get confused at seeing the movie article. Liu1126 (talk) 14:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- thanks for having a look and comments. I will remove the challenged sources or seek alternatives. Yabancı is the same slang in Turkish FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I haven't noticed any other glaring issues, so I think this article in its current state stands a fair chance at being promoted. One last thing is that it may benefit from a copy edit, as there are some odd words and phrases lying around. Normally, I would do it myself (since I'm also a guild member), but given that the article has already been nominated and I'm a quite busy IRL right now, an immediate request at WP:GOCER will hopefully get the job done in time. Good luck to both you and the article at WP:GAN! Liu1126 (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)